COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
RNW vs VST
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. RNW scored 54.9, VST scored 73.8 — VST leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. VST's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but RNW's are as of March 2025 — a 15-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
RNW
ReNew Energy Global Plc
54.9
$6.81 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.9
VST leads
VST
Vistra Corp.
73.8
$136.21 · $45.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthRNW+19.4%
- Strongest balance sheetVST3.73
- Highest qualityVST65 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
RNW
stronger →← stronger
VST
30
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
88
90
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
VST is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
RNW
VST
-$49mF
FCF
$2.3bB
+19.4%B+
Rev
+18.6%B+
5.25D
D/E
3.73D
1.7xB+
P/S
—
0.14A
PEG
0.41A
—
P/E
23.0xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
RNW
VST
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
17% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-34%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-14%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+25%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
RNW
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (INR)
VST
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
RNWReNew Energy Global Plc
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $2.5b. 17% off the 52-week high of $8.24. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.14 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $7.92 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 5.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$49m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
VSTVistra Corp.
Why now
Utilities - Independent Power Producers · market cap $45.7b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $219.82 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.41 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $219.72 (implying +61% upside).
Moat
ROE 40% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 102% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 3.73 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.43 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where RNW and VST diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.9 points in favor of VST. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityRNW 29.6 · VST 64.8VST +35.2
- ValueRNW 89.6 · VST 70.2RNW +19.4
- GrowthRNW 85.5 · VST 88.3level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.