COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
RJF vs TROW
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. RJF scored 76.0, TROW scored 75.0 — RJF leads.
Compare another set
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
71.2Fin
$179.36 · $34.5B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
17.8
TROW leads
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
89Fin
$111.24 · $23.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTROW11.3x
- Fastest growthRJF+9.5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
RJF
TROW
+9.5%B
Rev
+3.1%C+
15.7xC+
P/E
11.3xB+
18.4%B+
ROE
19.4%B+
2.71C+
P/B
2.16C+
1.2%C+
Yield
4.6%B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
RJFRaymond James Financial, Inc.
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $34.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $182.73 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $185.92 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
TROWT. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $23.7b. 9% off the 52-week high of $122.00. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $109.58 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Beta 1.48 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.