Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. RJF scored 79.0, HLNE scored 81.0 — HLNE leads.
Compare another set
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
Asset Management · Financial strength
74.4Fin
$155.07 · $29.8B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
11.4
HLNE leads
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
Asset Management · Financial strength
85.8Fin
$82.92 · $5.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestHLNE12.6x
Fastest growthRJF+9.5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
RJF
HLNE
+9.5%B
Rev
+6.5%C+
13.5xB
P/E
12.6xB
18.4%B+
ROE
32.4%A
2.40C+
P/B
3.96C
1.4%C+
Yield
2.8%B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
RJFRaymond James Financial, Inc.
Asset Management · $155.07 · beta 0.95
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $29.8b. 15% off the 52-week high of $182.73. PEG 0.78 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $185.43 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
HLNEHamilton Lane Incorporated
Asset Management · $82.92 · beta 1.25
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $5.6b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $155.66 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.38 (implying +56% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is HLNE or RJF the better stock?
HLNE scores higher: HLNE 81.0, RJF 79.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are HLNE and RJF scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.