COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
AMP vs RJF
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMP scored 78.0, RJF scored 76.0 — AMP leads.
Compare another set
AMP
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
80.3Fin
$559.32 · $49.4B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
9.1
AMP leads
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
71.2Fin
$179.36 · $34.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAMP13.4x
- Fastest growthRJF+9.5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMP
RJF
+7.0%B
Rev
+9.5%B
13.4xB
P/E
15.7xC+
63.4%A
ROE
18.4%B+
7.77D
P/B
2.71C+
1.2%C+
Yield
1.2%C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
AMPAmeriprise Financial, Inc.
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $49.4b. Trading near 52-week high of $572.56 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $579.45 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 63% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
RJFRaymond James Financial, Inc.
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $34.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $182.73 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $185.92 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.