Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. REYN scored 51.9, SLGN scored 60.3 — SLGN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SLGN's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but REYN's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
REYN
Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
51.9
$22.01 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.4
SLGN leads
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
60.3
$35.44 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestREYN13.4x
Fastest growthSLGN+8.4%
Strongest balance sheetREYN0.71
Highest qualityREYN70 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueSLGN-49%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
REYN
stronger →← stronger
SLGN
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
58
41
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
59
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
SLGN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
REYN
SLGN
$326mC
FCF
$343mC
+2.8%C
Rev
+8.4%B
0.71B+
D/E
2.03C+
13.4xA-
P/E
13.9xB+
6.42D
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
REYN
SLGN
37% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-10%/yr
+62%
1-yr DCF upside
+89%
+59%
5-yr DCF upside
+98%
+56%
10-yr DCF upside
+112%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
REYN
No notable signals flagged.
SLGN
Why this score
Raising its dividend
The companies
REYNReynolds Consumer Products Inc.
Packaging & Containers · $22.01 · beta 0.54
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.6b. 19% off the 52-week high of $27.32. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $27.14 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 99% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers · $35.44 · beta 0.67
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $3.7b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $49.55 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $53.85 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 2.03 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where REYN and SLGN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.4 points in favor of SLGN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthREYN 41.0 · SLGN 58.6SLGN +17.6
ValueREYN 48.5 · SLGN 64.3SLGN +15.8
QualityREYN 70.2 · SLGN 58.2REYN +12.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is SLGN or REYN the better stock?
SLGN scores higher: SLGN 60.3, REYN 51.9 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do SLGN and REYN differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where SLGN leads by 18 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are SLGN and REYN scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.