Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. RDW scored 23.9, HONA scored 72.0 — HONA leads.
Compare another set
RDW
Redwire Corporation
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
23.9
$9.58 · $2.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
48.1
HONA leads
HONA
Honeywell Aerospace Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
72
$157.94 · $50.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthRDW+63.1%
Highest qualityHONA76 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
RDW
stronger →← stronger
HONA
22
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
96
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
84
6
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
HONA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
RDW
HONA
-$98mF
FCF
$2.5bB
+63.1%A
Rev
+12.7%B+
0.06A
D/E
Negative equity
5.6xC
P/S
—
—
PEG
0.98B+
—
P/E
48.2xC
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
RDW
HONA
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% above
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-19%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-7%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+13%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
RDW
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
HONA
Why this score
Short track record
The companies
RDWRedwire Corporation
Aerospace & Defense · $9.58 · beta 3.13
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $2.4b. Down 64% from 52-week high of $26.64 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +63% — in hypergrowth territory. 8 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $14.69 (implying +53% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$98m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -57.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 64% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $157.94
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $50.1b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $297.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $201.87 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 128% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash. $50.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where RDW and HONA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 48.1 points in favor of HONA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueRDW 6.4 · HONA 61.5HONA +55.1
QualityRDW 22.0 · HONA 76.0HONA +54.0
GrowthRDW 96.4 · HONA 83.7RDW +12.7
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is HONA or RDW the better stock?
HONA scores higher: HONA 72.0, RDW 23.9 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do HONA and RDW differ most?
The widest gap is value, where HONA leads by 55 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are HONA and RDW scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.