Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. RDDT scored 72.0, OPRA scored 74.5 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. RDDT's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but OPRA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
RDDT
Reddit, Inc.
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
72
$159.91 · $30.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.5
OPRA leads
OPRA
Opera Limited
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
74.5
$17.58 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestOPRA12.1x
Fastest growthRDDT+66.6%
Strongest balance sheetRDDT0.01
Highest qualityRDDT79 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueOPRA-30%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
RDDT
stronger →← stronger
OPRA
79
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
99
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
95
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
63
RDDT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
RDDT
OPRA
$1.0bC+
FCF
$112mC
+66.6%A
Rev
+27.9%A-
0.01A
D/E
0.01A
37.2xC
P/E
12.1xB+
0.78A-
PEG
0.55A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
RDDT
OPRA
112% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
30% below
~37%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
-63%
1-yr DCF upside
+11%
-53%
5-yr DCF upside
+43%
-34%
10-yr DCF upside
+108%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
RDDT
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Short track record
OPRA
Why this score
Cut its dividend
The companies
RDDTReddit, Inc.
Internet Content & Information · $159.91 · beta 2.05
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $30.8b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $263.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +67% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.78 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 33 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $213.71 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 31% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.05 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
OPRAOpera Limited
Internet Content & Information · $17.58 · beta 1.20
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $20.78. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Dividend payout 86% of earnings on a 4.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model slightly favors OPRA (72.6) over RDDT (72.0) primarily due to OPRA's superior Value pillar score of 58 versus RDDT's 48, reflected in its B+ P/E grade. However, a contrarian might prefer RDDT for its significantly higher revenue growth of +66.6% and stronger Growth pillar of 99, despite its rich valuation. Investors should note RDDT's "Short track record" signal, which introduces more uncertainty.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where RDDT and OPRA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.5 points in favor of OPRA. The widest single difference is Quality, where RDDT leads by 10.0 points.
QualityRDDT 78.9 · OPRA 68.9RDDT +10.0
GrowthRDDT 99.1 · OPRA 95.4RDDT +3.7
ValueRDDT 60.8 · OPRA 63.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is OPRA or RDDT the better stock?
OPRA scores higher: OPRA 74.5, RDDT 72.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do OPRA and RDDT differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where RDDT leads by 10 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. RDDT also leads growth, while value is effectively level between them.
How are OPRA and RDDT scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.