COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
RBA vs VRSK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. RBA scored 63.8, VRSK scored 67.4 — VRSK leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. RBA's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but VRSK's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
RBA
RB Global, Inc.
63.8
$87.02 · $16.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.6
VRSK leads
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
67.4
$190.61 · $24.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestVRSK29.3x
- Fastest growthRBA+9.7%
- Highest qualityVRSK82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVRSK-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
RBA
stronger →← stronger
VRSK
60
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
71
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
RBA and VRSK split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
RBA
VRSK
$611mC+
FCF
$1.1bC+
+9.7%B
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.78B
D/E
—
37.5xC+
P/E
29.3xB
1.01B+
PEG
1.78C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
RBA
VRSK
4% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
-7%
1-yr DCF upside
-1%
+4%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
+23%
10-yr DCF upside
+37%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
RBA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
VRSK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
RBARB Global, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $16.1b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $119.58 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $128.91 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 126% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $24.8b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $273.83 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $237.71 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. FCF converts 124% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -78% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where RBA and VRSK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.6 points in favor of VRSK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityRBA 59.9 · VRSK 82.1VRSK +22.2
- ValueRBA 61.2 · VRSK 52.8RBA +8.4
- GrowthRBA 70.9 · VRSK 70.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.