COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
EFX vs RBA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EFX scored 66.7, RBA scored 63.8 — EFX leads.
Compare another set
EFX
Equifax Inc.
66.7
$192.62 · $22.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.9
EFX leads
RBA
RB Global, Inc.
63.8
$87.02 · $16.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEFX33.9x
- Fastest growthEFX+10.3%
- Strongest balance sheetRBA0.78
- Highest qualityEFX71 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueRBA-4%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EFX
stronger →← stronger
RBA
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
52
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
EFX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EFX
RBA
$1.1bC+
FCF
$611mC+
+10.3%B
Rev
+9.7%B
1.21C
D/E
0.78B
33.9xC+
P/E
37.5xC+
1.92C+
PEG
1.01B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EFX
RBA
23% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~6%/yr
-33%
1-yr DCF upside
-7%
-19%
5-yr DCF upside
+4%
+7%
10-yr DCF upside
+23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EFX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
RBA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
EFXEquifax Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $22.6b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $271.84 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $210.52 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 160% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
RBARB Global, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $16.1b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $119.58 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $128.91 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 126% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EFX and RBA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.9 points in favor of EFX. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityEFX 70.6 · RBA 59.9EFX +10.7
- GrowthEFX 80.9 · RBA 70.9EFX +10.0
- ValueEFX 51.9 · RBA 61.2RBA +9.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.