COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ALV vs RACE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ALV scored 65.4, RACE scored 31.5 — ALV leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. ALV's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but RACE's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
65.4
$125.37 · $9.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
33.9
ALV leads
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
31.5
$424.44 · $74.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestALV14.8x
- Fastest growthRACE+7.0%
- Strongest balance sheetRACE0.86
- Highest qualityRACE88 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueALV-18%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ALV
stronger →← stronger
RACE
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
8
ALV and RACE split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ALV
RACE
$757mC+
FCF
$1.7bC+
+5.9%C+
Rev
+7.0%B
0.88B
D/E
0.86B
14.8xA-
P/E
40.3xC
0.85B+
PEG
4.10D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ALV
RACE
18% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
72% above
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~20%/yr
+5%
1-yr DCF upside
-48%
+22%
5-yr DCF upside
-42%
+51%
10-yr DCF upside
-32%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ALV
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
RACE
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (EUR)
The companies
ALVAutoliv, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $9.2b. 5% off the 52-week high of $132.17. PEG 0.85 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $134.71 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
RACEFerrari N.V.
Why now
Auto Manufacturers · market cap $74.6b. 16% off the 52-week high of $504.49. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $464.80 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 41% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $74.6b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 40x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ALV and RACE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 33.9 points in favor of ALV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueALV 70.1 · RACE 8.2ALV +61.9
- QualityALV 79.8 · RACE 88.3RACE +8.5
- GrowthALV 50.0 · RACE 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.