COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
QXO vs SITE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. QXO scored 32.3, SITE scored 64.7 — SITE leads.
Compare another set
QXO
QXO, Inc.
32.3
$13.47 · $14.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
32.4
SITE leads
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
64.7
$95.94 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthQXO+408.3%
- Strongest balance sheetQXO0.57
- Highest qualitySITE56 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSITE-3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
QXO
stronger →← stronger
SITE
23
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
56
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
63
15
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
SITE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
QXO
SITE
$141mC
FCF
$250mC
+408.3%A
Rev
+3.6%C+
0.57B
D/E
0.67B
1.4xB+
P/S
—
3.19D
PEG
1.21B
—
P/E
26.3xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
QXO
SITE
635% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
-89%
1-yr DCF upside
-18%
-86%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
-81%
10-yr DCF upside
+42%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
QXO
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
SITE
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
QXOQXO, Inc.
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $14.0b. Down 51% from 52-week high of $27.61 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +408% — in hypergrowth territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $29.29 (implying +117% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -5.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 51% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.30 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
SITESiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $4.2b. Down 43% from 52-week high of $168.56 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $127.08 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 154% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 43% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where QXO and SITE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 32.4 points in favor of SITE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueQXO 14.6 · SITE 75.9SITE +61.3
- GrowthQXO 100.0 · SITE 63.4QXO +36.6
- QualityQXO 23.2 · SITE 56.4SITE +33.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.