COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
PVH vs SGI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PVH scored 54.2, SGI scored 69.9 — SGI leads.
Compare another set
PVH
PVH Corp.
54.2
$77.03 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
15.7
SGI leads
SGI
Somnigroup International Inc.
69.9
$64.31 · $13.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPVH23.8x
- Fastest growthSGI+27.1%
- Strongest balance sheetPVH0.86
- Highest qualitySGI72 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePVH-33%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PVH
stronger →← stronger
SGI
52
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
41
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
75
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
52
SGI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PVH
SGI
$551mC+
FCF
$769mC+
+3.5%C+
Rev
+27.1%A-
0.86B
D/E
1.98C+
23.8xC+
P/E
25.6xC+
0.06A
PEG
0.83B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PVH
SGI
33% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
2% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
+46%
1-yr DCF upside
-16%
+48%
5-yr DCF upside
+2%
+52%
10-yr DCF upside
+36%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PVH
Why this score
- Buying back stock
SGI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
PVHPVH Corp.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $3.6b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $100.75 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.06 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $91.83 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.75 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 1.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
SGISomnigroup International Inc.
Why now
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · market cap $13.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $98.56 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.83 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $89.44 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PVH and SGI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 15.7 points in favor of SGI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthPVH 41.0 · SGI 91.5SGI +50.5
- ValuePVH 74.8 · SGI 51.8PVH +23.0
- QualityPVH 52.1 · SGI 72.1SGI +20.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.