COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
NMR vs PURR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NMR scored 69.0, PURR scored 78.0 — PURR leads.
Compare another set
NMR
Nomura Holdings, Inc.
67.1Fin
$10.30 · $30.1B
Strength gap
0.4
PURR leads
PURR
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc.
67.5Fin
$11.61 · $2.3B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPURR3.6x
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
NMR
PURR
+10.8%B
Rev
—
12.1xB+
P/E
3.6xA
11.2%B
ROE
32.6%A
1.25B+
P/B
1.94B
3.2%B
Yield
0.0%C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
NMRNomura Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $30.1b. Trading near 52-week high of $10.36 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.81 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
D/E 9.46 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
PURRHyperliquid Strategies Inc.
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $2.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $14.14. PEG 0.01 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $13.05 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.