COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

OLLI vs PSMT

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OLLI scored 71.4, PSMT scored 48.8 — OLLI leads.
Compare another set
OLLI
Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.
Discount Stores · Quality-Growth
71.4
$76.07 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
22.6
OLLI leads
PSMT
PriceSmart, Inc.
Discount Stores · Quality-Growth
48.8
$172.87 · $5.3B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestOLLI18.8x
  • Fastest growthOLLI+16.7%
  • Strongest balance sheetPSMT0.24
  • Highest qualityOLLI68 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD71.4/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY68.4GROWTH84.3VALUE63.2
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD48.8/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY63.2GROWTH81.4VALUE22.6
OLLIPSMTQuality68.463.2Growth84.381.4Value63.222.6
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)0%27%14x38xOLLIPSMT

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFOLLI$213mPSMT$74m
RevOLLI+16.7%PSMT+10.2%
D/EOLLI0.38PSMT0.24
P/EOLLI18.8xPSMT33.2x
PEGOLLI1.39PSMT1.83
OLLI
stronger →← stronger
PSMT
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
63
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
23
OLLI is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
OLLI
PSMT
$213mC
FCF
$74mC-
+16.7%B+
Rev
+10.2%B
0.38A-
D/E
0.24A-
18.8xB
P/E
33.2xC
1.39B
PEG
1.83C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
OLLI
PSMT
17% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
211% above
~13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~39%/yr
-25%
1-yr DCF upside
-73%
-15%
5-yr DCF upside
-68%
+3%
10-yr DCF upside
-59%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
OLLIOllie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.
Discount Stores · $76.07 · beta 0.50
Why now
Discount Stores · market cap $4.6b. Down 46% from 52-week high of $140.17 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $106.20 (implying +40% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 46% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
PSMTPriceSmart, Inc.
Discount Stores · $172.87 · beta 0.79
Why now
Discount Stores · market cap $5.3b. 13% off the 52-week high of $199.84. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $153.33 (implying -11% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 2.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where OLLI and PSMT diverge

On the headline score the gap is 22.6 points in favor of OLLI. The widest single difference is Value, where OLLI leads by 40.6 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.