COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DLTR vs PSMT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DLTR scored 63.0, PSMT scored 48.8 — DLTR leads.
Compare another set
DLTR
Dollar Tree, Inc.
63
$131.48 · $25.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.2
DLTR leads
PSMT
PriceSmart, Inc.
48.8
$172.87 · $5.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDLTR21.1x
- Fastest growthPSMT+10.2%
- Strongest balance sheetPSMT0.24
- Highest qualityDLTR78 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDLTR-18%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DLTR
stronger →← stronger
PSMT
78
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
23
DLTR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DLTR
PSMT
$1.3bC+
FCF
$74mC-
+9.4%B
Rev
+10.2%B
2.17C
D/E
0.24A-
21.1xB
P/E
33.2xC
1.64C+
PEG
1.83C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DLTR
PSMT
18% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
211% above
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~39%/yr
+11%
1-yr DCF upside
-73%
+22%
5-yr DCF upside
-68%
+41%
10-yr DCF upside
-59%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DLTR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
PSMT
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
DLTRDollar Tree, Inc.
Why now
Discount Stores · market cap $25.3b. 8% off the 52-week high of $142.40. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $130.04 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 102% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.17 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
PSMTPriceSmart, Inc.
Why now
Discount Stores · market cap $5.3b. 13% off the 52-week high of $199.84. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $153.33 (implying -11% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 2.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DLTR and PSMT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.2 points in favor of DLTR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueDLTR 48.0 · PSMT 22.6DLTR +25.4
- QualityDLTR 78.0 · PSMT 63.2DLTR +14.8
- GrowthDLTR 66.9 · PSMT 81.4PSMT +14.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.