Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PRDO scored 77.3, TAL scored 70.5 — PRDO leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PRDO's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but TAL's are as of February 2026 — a 4-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation
Education & Training Services · Quality-Growth
77.3
$33.71 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.8
PRDO leads
TAL
TAL Education Group
Education & Training Services · Quality-Growth
70.5
$12.86 · $7.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestTAL8.0x
Fastest growthTAL+33.7%
Strongest balance sheetTAL0.10
Highest qualityPRDO89 / 100
Largest discount to fair valuePRDO-52%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PRDO
stronger →← stronger
TAL
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
72
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
72
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
PRDO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PRDO
TAL
$221mC
FCF
$508mC+
+11.7%B
Rev
+33.7%A
0.11A
D/E
0.10A
12.2xA-
P/E
8.0xA
0.68A-
PEG
2.90C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PRDO
TAL
52% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
16% above
~-12%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~2%/yr
+102%
1-yr DCF upside
-3%
+107%
5-yr DCF upside
-14%
+113%
10-yr DCF upside
-27%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PRDO
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
TAL
Why this score
Buying back stock
The companies
PRDOPerdoceo Education Corporation
Education & Training Services · $33.71 · beta 0.72
Why now
Education & Training Services · market cap $2.1b. 12% off the 52-week high of $38.50. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.68 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 17% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
TALTAL Education Group
Education & Training Services · $12.86 · beta 0.08
Why now
Education & Training Services · market cap $7.1b. 4% off the 52-week high of $13.37. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. 18 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $16.10 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 96% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PRDO and TAL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.8 points in favor of PRDO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityPRDO 89.4 · TAL 67.7PRDO +21.7
ValuePRDO 72.0 · TAL 77.3TAL +5.3
GrowthPRDO 71.7 · TAL 66.9PRDO +4.8
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is PRDO or TAL the better stock?
PRDO scores higher: PRDO 77.3, TAL 70.5 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do PRDO and TAL differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where PRDO leads by 22 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are PRDO and TAL scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.