COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026

HSY vs POST

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. HSY scored 67.6, POST scored 67.1 — HSY leads.
Compare another set
HSY
The Hershey Company
Confectioners · Quality-Growth
67.6
$184.23 · $37.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.5
HSY leads
POST
Post Holdings, Inc.
Packaged Foods · Quality-Growth
67.1
$80.58 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD67.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY81.5GROWTH75.9VALUE49.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD67.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY52.5GROWTH76.5VALUE75.2
HSY
stronger →← stronger
POST
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
52
76
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
77
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
POST is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
HSY
POST
$2.2bB
FCF
$553mC+
+7.7%B
Rev
+6.2%C+
1.30C+
D/E
2.47D
24.9xC+
P/E
14.3xA-
1.04B+
PEG
1.17B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
HSY
POST
16% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-16%/yr
+0%
1-yr DCF upside
+106%
+18%
5-yr DCF upside
+85%
+51%
10-yr DCF upside
+60%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
HSY
No notable signals flagged.
POST
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
HSYThe Hershey Company
Confectioners · $184.23 · beta 0.10
Why now
Confectioners · market cap $37.0b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $239.48 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $205.81 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 150% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
POSTPost Holdings, Inc.
Packaged Foods · $80.58 · beta 0.32
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $3.7b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $117.28 — deep drawdown territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $105.17 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 189% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.47 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where HSY and POST diverge

On the headline score the gap is 0.5 points in favour of HSY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.