COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GIC vs POOL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GIC scored 63.5, POOL scored 60.8 — GIC leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. GIC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but POOL's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
GIC
Global Industrial Company
63.5
$39.45 · $1.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.7
GIC leads
POOL
Pool Corporation
60.8
$187.98 · $6.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPOOL17.5x
- Fastest growthGIC+8.4%
- Strongest balance sheetGIC0.29
- Highest qualityGIC84 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GIC
stronger →← stronger
POOL
84
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
78
56
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
42
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
69
GIC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GIC
POOL
$87mC-
FCF
$313mC
+8.4%B
Rev
+1.8%C
0.29A-
D/E
1.35C
17.9xA-
P/E
17.5xA-
1.29B
PEG
1.60C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GIC
POOL
12% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% above
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~14%/yr
-1%
1-yr DCF upside
-33%
-10%
5-yr DCF upside
-29%
-22%
10-yr DCF upside
-23%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GIC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
POOL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
GICGlobal Industrial Company
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $1.5b. 3% off the 52-week high of $40.71.
Moat
ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 100% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
POOLPool Corporation
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $6.8b. Down 44% from 52-week high of $336.15 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $220.36 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 44% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GIC and POOL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.7 points in favor of GIC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueGIC 54.8 · POOL 68.9POOL +14.1
- GrowthGIC 55.8 · POOL 42.0GIC +13.8
- QualityGIC 83.7 · POOL 77.6GIC +6.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.