COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ADSK vs PLTR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADSK scored 82.2, PLTR scored 73.0 — ADSK leads.
Compare another set
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
82.2
$253.68 · $53.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.2
ADSK leads
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
73
$179.94 · $432.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestADSK37.0x
- Fastest growthPLTR+78.9%
- Strongest balance sheetPLTR0.02
- Highest qualityADSK88 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADSK
stronger →← stronger
PLTR
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
99
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
47
ADSK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADSK
PLTR
$2.7bB
FCF
$3.4bB
+18.3%B+
Rev
+78.9%A
0.85C+
D/E
0.02A
37.0xB
P/E
153.8xD
0.96B+
PEG
2.35C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADSK
PLTR
33% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
700% above
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
-33%
1-yr DCF upside
-90%
-25%
5-yr DCF upside
-87%
-10%
10-yr DCF upside
-82%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADSK
Why this score
- Durable high returns
PLTR
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
ADSKAutodesk, Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $53.6b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $329.09 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.96 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 34 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $314.19 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 46% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 187% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $432.4b. 13% off the 52-week high of $207.52. Revenue growing +79% — in hypergrowth territory. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $191.68 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 49% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 153.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.56 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 70.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADSK and PLTR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 9.2 points in favor of ADSK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueADSK 73.4 · PLTR 47.0ADSK +26.4
- GrowthADSK 85.9 · PLTR 98.8PLTR +12.9
- QualityADSK 87.9 · PLTR 83.9ADSK +4.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.