Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PLTR scored 79.5, ADBE scored 85.4 — ADBE leads.
Compare another set
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
Software - Infrastructure · Quality-Growth
79.5
$209.05 · $502.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.9
ADBE leads
ADBE
Adobe Inc.
Software - Application · Quality-Growth
85.4
$242.27 · $94.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestADBE13.5x
Fastest growthPLTR+78.9%
Strongest balance sheetPLTR0.02
Highest qualityADBE92 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueADBE-35%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PLTR
stronger →← stronger
ADBE
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
99
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
85
ADBE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PLTR
ADBE
$3.4bB
FCF
$10.6bA-
+78.9%A
Rev
+10.5%B
0.02A-
D/E
0.58C+
180.2xD
P/E
13.5xA-
1.72C+
PEG
0.58A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PLTR
ADBE
859% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
35% below
>60%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
-92%
1-yr DCF upside
+37%
-90%
5-yr DCF upside
+53%
-85%
10-yr DCF upside
+80%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PLTR
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
ADBE
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
The companies
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.
Software - Infrastructure · $209.05 · beta 1.60
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $502.4b. Trading near 52-week high of $209.30 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +79% — in hypergrowth territory. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $203.35 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
Net margin 49% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trailing P/E 180.2x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Beta 1.60 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
ADBEAdobe Inc.
Software - Application · $242.27 · beta 1.42
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $94.3b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $363.70 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.58 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 32 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $275.06 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Net margin 28% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 62% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 145% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.42 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PLTR and ADBE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 5.9 points in favor of ADBE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValuePLTR 61.3 · ADBE 84.8ADBE +23.5
GrowthPLTR 98.8 · ADBE 79.7PLTR +19.1
QualityPLTR 83.0 · ADBE 92.1ADBE +9.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ADBE or PLTR the better stock?
ADBE scores higher: ADBE 85.4, PLTR 79.5 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ADBE and PLTR differ most?
The widest gap is value, where ADBE leads by 24 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are ADBE and PLTR scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.