Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PL scored 27.4, TXT scored 69.1 — TXT leads.
Compare another set
PL
Planet Labs PBC
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
27.4
$17.18 · $6.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
41.7
TXT leads
TXT
Textron Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · Quality-Growth
69.1
$74.16 · $12.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthPL+44.1%
Strongest balance sheetTXT0.52
Highest qualityTXT67 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueTXT-6%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PL
stronger →← stronger
TXT
24
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
9
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
TXT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PL
TXT
$25mC-
FCF
$759mC+
+44.1%A
Rev
+8.8%B
0.88C+
D/E
0.52B+
16.5xD
P/S
—
—
PEG
0.85B+
—
P/E
14.0xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PL
TXT
1780% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% below
>60%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
-96%
1-yr DCF upside
0%
-95%
5-yr DCF upside
+6%
-93%
10-yr DCF upside
+17%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PL
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
TXT
Why this score
Buying back stock
The companies
PLPlanet Labs PBC
Aerospace & Defense · $17.18 · beta 2.17
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $6.3b. Down 67% from 52-week high of $51.76 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +44% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $31.91 (implying +86% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -95.1%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 67% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.17 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
TXTTextron Inc.
Aerospace & Defense · $74.16 · beta 0.91
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $12.8b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $101.57 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.85 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $100.27 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PL and TXT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 41.7 points in favor of TXT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValuePL 9.0 · TXT 75.6TXT +66.6
QualityPL 24.3 · TXT 67.1TXT +42.8
GrowthPL 95.1 · TXT 65.2PL +29.9
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is TXT or PL the better stock?
TXT scores higher: TXT 69.1, PL 27.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do TXT and PL differ most?
The widest gap is value, where TXT leads by 67 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are TXT and PL scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.