COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

PJT vs IX

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PJT scored 76.0, IX scored 77.0 — IX leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PJT's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but IX's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
PJT
PJT Partners Inc.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
58.4Fin
$137.28 · $5.8B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
10.9
IX leads
IX
ORIX Corporation
Financial Conglomerates · Financial strength
69.3Fin
$36.95 · $39.8B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestIX10.3x
  • Fastest growthIX+18.6%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD58.4/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL58.4
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD69.3/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL69.3
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)5%29%5.3x24xPJTIX

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

RevPJT+14.8%IX+18.6%
P/EPJT18.8xIX10.3x
PJT
IX
+14.8%B+
Rev
+18.6%B+
18.8xC
P/E
10.3xA-
37.6%A
ROE
—
11.26D
P/B
—
0.7%C
Yield
—
—
FCF
$235mC
—
D/E
1.30C+
—
PEG
2.72C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
PJTPJT Partners Inc.
Capital Markets · $137.28 · beta 0.88
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $5.8b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $195.62 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $160.71 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Regulatory capital risk — stricter capital requirements (CCAR, Basel) can force a dividend cut or a capital raise; the largest banks are most exposed because they're held to the tightest standards.
IXORIX Corporation
Financial Conglomerates · $36.95 · beta 0.74
Why now
Financial Conglomerates · market cap $39.8b. 13% off the 52-week high of $42.39. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is IX or PJT the better stock?

IX scores higher: IX 77.0, PJT 76.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are IX and PJT scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.