COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
PINS vs ZG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PINS scored 68.8, ZG scored 51.9 — PINS leads.
Compare another set
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
68.8
$23.40 · $13.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.9
PINS leads
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc.
51.9
$36.78 · $8.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPINS68.8x
- Fastest growthZG+17.7%
- Strongest balance sheetZG0.13
- Highest qualityPINS62 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePINS-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PINS
stronger →← stronger
ZG
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
35
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
78
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
PINS is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PINS
ZG
$1.3bC+
FCF
$258mC
+16.6%B+
Rev
+17.7%B+
0.41B+
D/E
0.13A-
68.8xC
P/E
159.9xD
0.36A
PEG
0.92B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PINS
ZG
53% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
138% above
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~40%/yr
+76%
1-yr DCF upside
-68%
+114%
5-yr DCF upside
-58%
+185%
10-yr DCF upside
-41%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PINS
No notable signals flagged.
ZG
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
PINSPinterest, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $13.3b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $38.57 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 36 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $28.99 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 68.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
ZGZillow Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $8.3b. Down 59% from 52-week high of $90.22 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.92 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $47.23 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 159.9x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 59% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.98 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PINS and ZG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.9 points in favor of PINS. The widest single difference is Quality, where PINS leads by 26.9 points.
- QualityPINS 62.3 · ZG 35.4PINS +26.9
- ValuePINS 60.8 · ZG 50.2PINS +10.6
- GrowthPINS 85.8 · ZG 78.4PINS +7.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.