COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
PINS vs RDDT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PINS scored 71.7, RDDT scored 69.9 — PINS leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. RDDT's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but PINS's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
71.7
$25.50 · $14.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.8
PINS leads
RDDT
Reddit, Inc.
69.9
$160.00 · $30.8B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PINS
stronger →← stronger
RDDT
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
100
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
RDDT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PINS
RDDT
$1.2bC+
FCF
$1.0bC+
+16.3%B+
Rev
+66.6%A
0.42B+
D/E
0.01A
53.1xC
P/E
37.2xC+
0.39A
PEG
1.01B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PINS
RDDT
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
125% above
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~38%/yr
+53%
1-yr DCF upside
-66%
+84%
5-yr DCF upside
-55%
+140%
10-yr DCF upside
-37%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PINS
No notable signals flagged.
RDDT
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
The companies
PINSPinterest, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $14.3b. Down 36% from 52-week high of $39.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.39 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 36 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $27.64 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 53.1x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 36% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
RDDTReddit, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $30.8b. Down 43% from 52-week high of $282.95 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +67% — in hypergrowth territory. 33 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $218.17 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
Net margin 31% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 43% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.03 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.