COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
OPRA vs PINS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OPRA scored 72.5, PINS scored 68.8 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PINS's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but OPRA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
OPRA
Opera Limited
72.5
$18.86 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.7
OPRA leads
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
68.8
$23.47 · $13.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestOPRA13.7x
- Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
- Strongest balance sheetOPRA0.01
- Highest qualityOPRA69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePINS-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OPRA
stronger →← stronger
PINS
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
86
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
OPRA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OPRA
PINS
$112mC
FCF
$1.3bC+
+27.9%A-
Rev
+16.6%B+
0.01A
D/E
0.41B+
13.7xB+
P/E
69.0xC
0.59A-
PEG
0.36A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OPRA
PINS
20% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-7%/yr
-2%
1-yr DCF upside
+76%
+25%
5-yr DCF upside
+114%
+78%
10-yr DCF upside
+184%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OPRA
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
PINS
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
OPRAOpera Limited
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $21.06. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 87% of earnings on a 4.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
PINSPinterest, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $13.3b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $38.57 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 36 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $28.99 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 69.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OPRA and PINS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.7 points in favor of OPRA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthOPRA 95.4 · PINS 85.8OPRA +9.6
- QualityOPRA 69.0 · PINS 62.4OPRA +6.6
- ValueOPRA 57.8 · PINS 60.8PINS +3.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.