COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
IR vs PH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IR scored 72.9, PH scored 43.6 — IR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. IR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but PH's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
72.9
$80.51 · $31.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
29.3
IR leads
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
43.6
$1,001.74 · $126.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestIR33.3x
- Fastest growthIR+7.8%
- Strongest balance sheetIR0.48
- Highest qualityPH80 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
IR
stronger →← stronger
PH
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
76
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
70
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
15
IR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
IR
PH
$1.2bC+
FCF
$3.7bB
+7.8%B
Rev
+6.0%C+
0.48B+
D/E
0.55B
33.3xC+
P/E
35.2xC+
0.73A-
PEG
3.43D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
IR
PH
67% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
114% above
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~27%/yr
-45%
1-yr DCF upside
-58%
-40%
5-yr DCF upside
-53%
-32%
10-yr DCF upside
-46%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
IR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
PH
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $31.2b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $100.96 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.73 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $96.25 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
PHParker-Hannifin Corporation
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $126.3b. 9% off the 52-week high of $1099.94. 23 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,161 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 106% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where IR and PH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 29.3 points in favor of IR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueIR 77.5 · PH 14.9IR +62.6
- QualityIR 65.5 · PH 80.1PH +14.6
- GrowthIR 76.5 · PH 69.7IR +6.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.