COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
LNC vs PFSI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LNC scored 76.0, PFSI scored 84.0 — PFSI leads.
Compare another set
LNC
Lincoln National Corporation
90Fin
$42.15 · $8.1B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
27.5
LNC leads
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
62.5Fin
$75.09 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLNC3.6x
- Fastest growthPFSI+55.3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
LNC
PFSI
+2.0%C
Rev
+55.3%A
3.6xA
P/E
10.3xA-
22.6%A-
ROE
—
0.78A
P/B
—
4.1%B+
Yield
—
—
PEG
0.19A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
LNCLincoln National Corporation
Why now
Insurance - Life · market cap $8.1b. 12% off the 52-week high of $47.67. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $47.08 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
Why now
Mortgage Finance · market cap $3.9b. Down 53% from 52-week high of $160.36 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +55% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.19 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $90.57 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Down 53% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.