COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
PENN vs YUMC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PENN scored 47.8, YUMC scored 74.5 — YUMC leads.
Compare another set
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
47.8
$18.64 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.7
YUMC leads
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
74.5
$49.52 · $16.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthYUMC+8.8%
- Strongest balance sheetYUMC0.38
- Highest qualityYUMC84 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePENN-62%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PENN
stronger →← stronger
YUMC
30
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
YUMC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PENN
YUMC
$370mC
FCF
$940mC+
+6.1%C+
Rev
+8.8%B
5.97D
D/E
0.38A-
0.3xA
P/S
—
1.01B+
PEG
1.19B+
—
P/E
18.1xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PENN
YUMC
62% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~-9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
+100%
1-yr DCF upside
-9%
+160%
5-yr DCF upside
+4%
+279%
10-yr DCF upside
+28%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PENN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
YUMC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
PENNPENN Entertainment, Inc.
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $2.5b. 17% off the 52-week high of $22.36. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $24.39 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 5.97 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -12.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
YUMCYum China Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $16.9b. 15% off the 52-week high of $58.39. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $62.05 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 96% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PENN and YUMC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.7 points in favor of YUMC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityPENN 29.9 · YUMC 84.0YUMC +54.1
- GrowthPENN 50.0 · YUMC 75.4YUMC +25.4
- ValuePENN 72.7 · YUMC 65.3PENN +7.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.