COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
PENN vs YETI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PENN scored 47.8, YETI scored 67.9 — YETI leads.
Compare another set
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
47.8
$18.64 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.1
YETI leads
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
67.9
$43.76 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthYETI+6.2%
- Strongest balance sheetYETI0.42
- Highest qualityYETI90 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePENN-62%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PENN
stronger →← stronger
YETI
30
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
PENN and YETI split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PENN
YETI
$370mC
FCF
$257mC
+6.1%C+
Rev
+6.2%C+
5.97D
D/E
0.42A-
0.3xA
P/S
—
1.01B+
PEG
1.27B
—
P/E
19.2xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PENN
YETI
62% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% above
~-9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
+100%
1-yr DCF upside
-17%
+160%
5-yr DCF upside
-6%
+279%
10-yr DCF upside
+11%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PENN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
YETI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
PENNPENN Entertainment, Inc.
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $2.5b. 17% off the 52-week high of $22.36. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $24.39 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 5.97 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -12.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Leisure · market cap $3.2b. 19% off the 52-week high of $53.99. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.53 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PENN and YETI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.1 points in favor of YETI. The widest single difference is Quality, where YETI leads by 59.7 points.
- QualityPENN 29.9 · YETI 89.6YETI +59.7
- ValuePENN 72.7 · YETI 69.9level
- GrowthPENN 50.0 · YETI 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.