Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PBI scored 62.7, HAFN scored 60.8 — PBI leads.
Compare another set
PBI
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · Quality-Growth
62.7
$16.80 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.9
PBI leads
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
Marine Shipping · Quality-Growth
60.8
$10.72 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestHAFN8.4x
Fastest growthPBI-5.3%
Highest qualityHAFN93 / 100
Largest discount to fair valuePBI-31%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PBI
stronger →← stronger
HAFN
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
93
39
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
27
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
89
HAFN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PBI
HAFN
$415mC
FCF
$584mC+
-5.3%D
Rev
-20.5%F
Negative equity
D/E
0.33A-
13.8xA-
P/E
8.4xA
0.63A-
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PBI
HAFN
31% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% below
~-11%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+62%
1-yr DCF upside
+38%
+45%
5-yr DCF upside
+23%
+26%
10-yr DCF upside
+5%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $2.3b. 12% off the 52-week high of $19.07. Revenue -5% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. PEG 0.63 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $19.56 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income, mostly because of cash released from working capital ($120m) — a release that doesn't repeat every year the way earnings can.
Risk
Revenue contracting -5% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Beta 1.65 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
HAFNHafnia Limited
Marine Shipping · $10.72 · beta -0.19
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $5.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $10.89 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue -20% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Revenue contracting -20% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
HAFN leads PBI by 8.6 points (71.5 to 62.9), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade B). A contrarian could still prefer PBI, which trades about 32% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. All screen as value-type names but sit in different sectors (Marine Shipping versus Integrated Freight & Logistics), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PBI and HAFN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.9 points in favor of PBI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValuePBI 77.2 · HAFN 89.5HAFN +12.3
GrowthPBI 38.8 · HAFN 27.1PBI +11.7
QualityPBI 82.1 · HAFN 92.7HAFN +10.6
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is PBI or HAFN the better stock?
PBI scores higher: PBI 62.7, HAFN 60.8 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do PBI and HAFN differ most?
The widest gap is value, where HAFN leads by 12 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are PBI and HAFN scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.