COMPARE · Reviewed August 10, 2026
PBF vs RRC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PBF scored 66.8, RRC scored 66.1 — PBF leads.
Compare another set
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
66.8
$66.29 · $7.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.7
PBF leads
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
66.1
$40.29 · $9.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PBF
stronger →← stronger
RRC
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
85
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
PBF and RRC split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PBF
RRC
$743mC+
FCF
$1.4bC+
+13.5%B+
Rev
+17.3%B+
0.38B+
D/E
0.22A-
5.8xA
P/E
11.1xB+
—
PEG
1.01B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PBF
RRC
13% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-15%/yr
+28%
1-yr DCF upside
+100%
+15%
5-yr DCF upside
+85%
0%
10-yr DCF upside
+66%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PBF
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
RRC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
PBFPBF Energy Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $7.9b. 11% off the 52-week high of $74.74. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $64.85 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Net margin 3.9% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
RRCRange Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $9.4b. 17% off the 52-week high of $48.31. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $45.82 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PBF and RRC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.7 points in favour of PBF. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValuePBF 84.6 · RRC 64.8PBF +19.8
- QualityPBF 70.3 · RRC 89.2RRC +18.9
- GrowthPBF 50.0 · RRC 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.