Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PBA scored 40.2, PAGP scored 58.5 — PAGP leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PAGP's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but PBA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
PBA
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Oil & Gas Midstream · Quality-Growth
40.2
$47.31 · $27.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.3
PAGP leads
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings, L.P.
Oil & Gas Midstream · Quality-Growth
58.5
$26.62 · $6.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestPBA23.1x
Fastest growthPAGP+12.2%
Strongest balance sheetPAGP0.56
Highest qualityPAGP70 / 100
Largest discount to fair valuePAGP-91%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PBA
stronger →← stronger
PAGP
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
22
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
PAGP is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PBA
PAGP
$1.5bC+
FCF
$2.4bB
+5.3%C+
Rev
+12.2%B+
0.81C+
D/E
0.56B
23.1xC+
P/E
60.5xC
1.70C+
PEG
0.67A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PBA
PAGP
1% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
91% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
decline
-1%
1-yr DCF upside
+888%
+1%
5-yr DCF upside
+1006%
+3%
10-yr DCF upside
+1211%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PBA
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Cyclical growth
Foreign reporter (CAD)
PAGP
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Cyclical growth
The companies
PBAPembina Pipeline Corporation
Oil & Gas Midstream · $47.31 · beta 0.75
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $27.5b. 8% off the 52-week high of $51.58.
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 126% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Dividend payout 101% of earnings on a 4.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
PAGPPlains GP Holdings, L.P.
Oil & Gas Midstream · $26.62 · beta 0.52
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $6.2b. 7% off the 52-week high of $28.70. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.38 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
Trailing P/E 60.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Dividend payout 363% of earnings on a 6.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 1.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PBA and PAGP diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.3 points in favor of PAGP. The widest single difference is Value, where PAGP leads by 35.1 points.
ValuePBA 22.2 · PAGP 57.3PAGP +35.1
QualityPBA 68.4 · PAGP 70.0level
GrowthPBA 50.0 · PAGP 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is PAGP or PBA the better stock?
PAGP scores higher: PAGP 58.5, PBA 40.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do PAGP and PBA differ most?
The widest gap is value, where PAGP leads by 35 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. The other two pillars are close enough to call level, so this is the one place they genuinely separate.
How are PAGP and PBA scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.