COMPARE · Reviewed July 23, 2026
PARR vs VET
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PARR scored 64.1, VET scored 65.5 — VET leads.
Compare another set
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
64.1
$77.61 · $3.9B
Score gap
1.4
VET leads
VET
Vermilion Energy Inc.
65.5
$11.24 · $1.7B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PARR
stronger →← stronger
VET
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
75
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
100
PARR and VET split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PARR
VET
$255mC
FCF
$987mC+
-2.5%D+
Rev
+14.1%B+
0.87C+
D/E
0.64B
8.8xA-
P/E
—
—
P/S
1.4xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PARR
VET
8% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
93% below
~0%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
+3%
1-yr DCF upside
+923%
-7%
5-yr DCF upside
+1245%
-20%
10-yr DCF upside
+1911%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PARR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Revenue shrinking
VET
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
The companies
PARRPar Pacific Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $3.9b. 6% off the 52-week high of $82.29. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $80.86 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
VETVermilion Energy Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $1.7b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $14.82 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -37.0%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -29% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.