COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
PARR vs PSX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PARR scored 68.4, PSX scored 54.5 — PARR leads.
Compare another set
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
68.4
$79.03 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.9
PARR leads
PSX
Phillips 66
54.5
$242.87 · $97.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPARR4.6x
- Fastest growthPSX+14.4%
- Strongest balance sheetPARR0.56
- Highest qualityPARR73 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePARR-34%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PARR
stronger →← stronger
PSX
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
88
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
PARR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PARR
PSX
$412mC
FCF
$6.4bB+
+13.2%B+
Rev
+14.4%B+
0.56B
D/E
0.63B
4.6xA
P/E
110.9xD
—
PEG
1.15B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PARR
PSX
34% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% below
~-11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-3%/yr
+69%
1-yr DCF upside
+18%
+52%
5-yr DCF upside
+6%
+30%
10-yr DCF upside
-10%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PARR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
PSX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
PARRPar Pacific Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $4.0b. 9% off the 52-week high of $87.03. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $83.00 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
PSXPhillips 66
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $97.4b. Trading near 52-week high of $246.95 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $221.68 (implying -9% upside).
Moat
ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. $97.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 110.9x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where PARR and PSX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.9 points in favor of PARR. The widest single difference is Value, where PARR leads by 39.8 points.
- ValuePARR 88.0 · PSX 48.2PARR +39.8
- QualityPARR 72.9 · PSX 67.2PARR +5.7
- GrowthPARR 50.0 · PSX 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.