COMPARE · Reviewed July 30, 2026
PARR vs PBF
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. PARR scored 62.3, PBF scored 52.5 — PARR leads.
Compare another set
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
62.3
$85.91 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.8
PARR leads
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
52.5
$73.10 · $8.7B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
PARR
stronger →← stronger
PBF
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
68
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
42
PARR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
PARR
PBF
$255mC
FCF
$743mC+
-2.5%D+
Rev
+13.5%B+
0.87C+
D/E
0.64B
9.7xA-
P/E
16.7xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
PARR
PBF
19% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-3%/yr
-7%
1-yr DCF upside
+16%
-16%
5-yr DCF upside
+5%
-28%
10-yr DCF upside
-10%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
PARR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Revenue shrinking
PBF
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
PARRPar Pacific Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $86.47 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $83.00 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
PBFPBF Energy Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $8.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $74.74 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $57.08 (implying -22% upside).
Moat
ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Net margin 3.9% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.