COMPARE · Data as of October 13, 2026

OZK vs NWG

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OZK scored 76.0, NWG scored 77.0 — NWG leads.
Compare another set
OZK
Bank OZK
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
75.6Fin
$45.08 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
2.5
NWG leads
NWG
NatWest Group plc
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
78.1Fin
$17.65 · $69.9B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestOZK7.4x
  • Fastest growthNWG+13.3%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD75.6/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL75.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD78.1/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL78.1
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-6%23%2.4x14xOZKNWG

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

RevOZK+4.2%NWG+13.3%
P/EOZK7.4xNWG8.8x
ROEOZK11.3%NWG14.8%
P/BOZK0.83NWG1.34
YieldOZK4.4%NWG5.5%
OZK
NWG
+4.2%C+
Rev
+13.3%B+
7.4xA
P/E
8.8xA-
11.3%B
ROE
14.8%B
0.83A-
P/B
1.34B+
4.4%B+
Yield
5.5%A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
OZKBank OZK
Banks - Regional · $45.08 · beta 0.91
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $4.9b. 16% off the 52-week high of $53.39. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $53.78 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 45% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
NWGNatWest Group plc
Banks - Regional · $17.65 · beta 0.82
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $69.9b. 9% off the 52-week high of $19.42. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $21.91 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Net margin 38% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $69.9b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is NWG or OZK the better stock?

NWG scores higher: NWG 77.0, OZK 76.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are NWG and OZK scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.