COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
OTTR vs SEB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OTTR scored 41.5, SEB scored 57.3 — SEB leads.
Compare another set
OTTR
Otter Tail Corporation
41.5
$89.85 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
15.8
SEB leads
SEB
Seaboard Corporation
57.3
$4,562.80 · $4.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OTTR
stronger →← stronger
SEB
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
47
22
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
55
49
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
SEB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OTTR
SEB
$2mC-
FCF
-$15mF
-0.5%D+
Rev
+6.6%C+
0.63B
D/E
0.35A-
13.5xA
P/E
—
1.93C+
PEG
0.65A-
—
P/S
0.4xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OTTR
SEB
17174% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-99%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-99%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-100%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OTTR
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
SEB
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
OTTROtter Tail Corporation
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $3.8b. 5% off the 52-week high of $95.00.
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
SEBSeaboard Corporation
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $4.4b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $5989.37 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.65 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$15m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.