COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
OTIS vs VRT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OTIS scored 69.0, VRT scored 77.4 — VRT leads.
Compare another set
OTIS
Otis Worldwide Corporation
69
$71.44 · $27.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.4
VRT leads
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
77.4
$229.30 · $88.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OTIS
stronger →← stronger
VRT
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
62
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
99
79
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
55
VRT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OTIS
VRT
$1.7bC+
FCF
$2.9bB
+5.2%C+
Rev
+26.2%A-
—
D/E
0.77B
18.4xA-
P/E
51.9xC
1.39B
PEG
1.35B
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OTIS
VRT
22% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
124% above
~3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~38%/yr
+12%
1-yr DCF upside
-65%
+28%
5-yr DCF upside
-55%
+55%
10-yr DCF upside
-37%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OTIS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
VRT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
OTISOtis Worldwide Corporation
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $27.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $94.56 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $90.50 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 113% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
ROE -26% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
VRTVertiv Holdings Co
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $88.3b. Down 40% from 52-week high of $379.94 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $376.15 (implying +64% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 51.9x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 40% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.03 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.