COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
CTS vs OSIS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CTS scored 63.8, OSIS scored 61.6 — CTS leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. OSIS's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but CTS's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CTS
CTS Corporation
63.8
$57.02 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.2
CTS leads
OSIS
OSI Systems, Inc.
61.6
$210.89 · $3.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestOSIS23.6x
- Fastest growthCTS+7.8%
- Strongest balance sheetCTS0.16
- Highest qualityCTS73 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueOSIS-13%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CTS
stronger →← stronger
OSIS
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
CTS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CTS
OSIS
$88mC-
FCF
$245mC
+7.8%B
Rev
+4.3%C+
0.16B+
D/E
1.26C
23.9xB+
P/E
23.6xB+
1.44B
PEG
1.51C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CTS
OSIS
14% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
-19%
1-yr DCF upside
+1%
-12%
5-yr DCF upside
+15%
-1%
10-yr DCF upside
+38%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CTS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
OSIS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
CTSCTS Corporation
Why now
Electronic Components · market cap $1.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $69.55.
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
OSISOSI Systems, Inc.
Why now
Electronic Components · market cap $3.4b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $311.72 — deep drawdown territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $281.14 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 159% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CTS and OSIS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.2 points in favor of CTS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityCTS 73.2 · OSIS 66.8CTS +6.4
- GrowthCTS 70.4 · OSIS 65.4CTS +5.0
- ValueCTS 50.4 · OSIS 53.4OSIS +3.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.