COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ORLA vs STDN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ORLA scored 64.6, STDN scored 44.8 — ORLA leads.
Compare another set
ORLA
Orla Mining Ltd
64.6
$9.44 · $3.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.8
ORLA leads
STDN
Standard Nuclear, Inc.
44.8
$11.94 · $1.9B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthORLA+207.6%
- Highest qualityORLA81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueORLA-35%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ORLA
stronger →← stronger
STDN
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
45
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
ORLA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ORLA
STDN
$359mC
FCF
—
+207.6%A
Rev
+57.1%A
0.42B
D/E
—
13.1xA-
P/E
—
1.34B
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ORLA
STDN
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+40%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+53%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+72%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ORLA
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
STDN
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
ORLAOrla Mining Ltd
Why now
Gold · market cap $3.5b. Down 57% from 52-week high of $21.98 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +208% — in hypergrowth territory.
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 42% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 57% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
STDNStandard Nuclear, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $1.9b. 15% off the 52-week high of $13.98. Revenue growing +57% — in hypergrowth territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.00 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Higher-variance name — the thesis leans on growth and valuation rather than a long, settled track record, so it depends on execution continuing. Position size accordingly; a deep drawdown shouldn't change the thesis.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
ORLA leads STDN by 19.8 points (64.6 to 44.8). Note they play different roles — ORLA screens as growth, STDN screens as spec — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ORLA and STDN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.8 points in favor of ORLA. The widest single difference is Quality, where ORLA leads by 35.9 points.
- QualityORLA 80.9 · STDN 45.0ORLA +35.9
- ValueORLA 66.7 · STDN 40.0ORLA +26.7
- GrowthORLA 50.0 · STDN 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.