COMPARE · Reviewed July 17, 2026
ORLA vs SSRM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ORLA scored 72.4, SSRM scored 69.1 — ORLA leads.
Compare another set
ORLA
Orla Mining Ltd.
72.4
$8.61 · $3.2B
Score gap
3.3
ORLA leads
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
69.1
$25.57 · $5.3B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ORLA
stronger →← stronger
SSRM
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
99
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
97
ORLA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ORLA
SSRM
$768mC+
FCF
$380mC
+207.6%A
Rev
+63.7%A
0.42B
D/E
0.02A-
12.0xA-
P/E
9.8xA-
0.06A
PEG
0.02A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ORLA
SSRM
73% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
36% below
~-24%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
+236%
1-yr DCF upside
+32%
+277%
5-yr DCF upside
+57%
+342%
10-yr DCF upside
+103%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ORLA
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
- Cyclical growth
SSRM
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Cyclical growth
The companies
ORLAOrla Mining Ltd.
Why now
Gold · market cap $3.2b. Down 61% from 52-week high of $21.98 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +208% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.06 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Down 61% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
SSRMSSR Mining Inc.
Why now
Gold · market cap $5.3b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $36.52 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +64% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.02 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $41.40 (implying +62% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.