COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
OPRA vs ZG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OPRA scored 73.1, ZG scored 51.9 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. ZG's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but OPRA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
OPRA
Opera Limited
73.1
$18.96 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.2
OPRA leads
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc.
51.9
$36.78 · $8.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestOPRA13.7x
- Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
- Strongest balance sheetOPRA0.01
- Highest qualityOPRA69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueOPRA-35%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OPRA
stronger →← stronger
ZG
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
35
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
78
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
OPRA is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OPRA
ZG
$112mC
FCF
$258mC
+27.9%A-
Rev
+17.7%B+
0.01A
D/E
0.13A-
13.7xB+
P/E
159.9xD
0.54A-
PEG
0.92B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OPRA
ZG
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
138% above
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~40%/yr
+18%
1-yr DCF upside
-68%
+54%
5-yr DCF upside
-58%
+128%
10-yr DCF upside
-41%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OPRA
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
ZG
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
OPRAOpera Limited
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $21.06. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 87% of earnings on a 4.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
ZGZillow Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $8.3b. Down 59% from 52-week high of $90.22 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.92 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $47.23 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 159.9x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 59% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.98 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OPRA and ZG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.2 points in favor of OPRA. The widest single difference is Quality, where OPRA leads by 33.9 points.
- QualityOPRA 69.3 · ZG 35.4OPRA +33.9
- GrowthOPRA 95.4 · ZG 78.4OPRA +17.0
- ValueOPRA 59.0 · ZG 50.2OPRA +8.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.