COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
OPRA vs Z
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OPRA scored 73.1, Z scored 51.7 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. Z's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but OPRA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
OPRA
Opera Limited
73.1
$18.96 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.4
OPRA leads
Z
Zillow Group, Inc.
51.7
$35.88 · $8.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestOPRA13.7x
- Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
- Strongest balance sheetOPRA0.01
- Highest qualityOPRA69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueOPRA-35%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OPRA
stronger →← stronger
Z
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
35
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
78
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
OPRA is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OPRA
Z
$112mC
FCF
$258mC
+27.9%A-
Rev
+17.7%B+
0.01A
D/E
0.13A-
13.7xB+
P/E
156.0xD
0.54A-
PEG
0.93B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OPRA
Z
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
132% above
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~39%/yr
+18%
1-yr DCF upside
-67%
+54%
5-yr DCF upside
-57%
+128%
10-yr DCF upside
-39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OPRA
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
Z
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
OPRAOpera Limited
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $21.06. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 87% of earnings on a 4.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
ZZillow Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $8.1b. Down 62% from 52-week high of $93.88 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $46.00 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 156.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 62% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.98 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OPRA and Z diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.4 points in favor of OPRA. The widest single difference is Quality, where OPRA leads by 33.9 points.
- QualityOPRA 69.3 · Z 35.4OPRA +33.9
- GrowthOPRA 95.4 · Z 78.4OPRA +17.0
- ValueOPRA 59.0 · Z 49.8OPRA +9.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.