Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OPRA scored 74.5, STUB scored 39.7 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. STUB's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but OPRA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
OPRA
Opera Limited
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
74.5
$17.58 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
34.8
OPRA leads
STUB
StubHub Holdings, Inc.
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
39.7
$6.12 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
Strongest balance sheetOPRA0.01
Highest qualityOPRA69 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueSTUB-79%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OPRA
stronger →← stronger
STUB
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
36
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
60
63
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
29
OPRA is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OPRA
STUB
$112mC
FCF
$634mC+
+27.9%A-
Rev
+7.9%B
0.01A
D/E
0.67B
12.1xB+
P/E
—
0.55A-
PEG
—
—
P/S
1.2xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OPRA
STUB
30% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
79% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
decline
+11%
1-yr DCF upside
+334%
+43%
5-yr DCF upside
+382%
+108%
10-yr DCF upside
+461%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OPRA
Why this score
Cut its dividend
STUB
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Short track record
The companies
OPRAOpera Limited
Internet Content & Information · $17.58 · beta 1.20
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $20.78. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Dividend payout 86% of earnings on a 4.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
STUBStubHub Holdings, Inc.
Internet Content & Information · $6.12
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $2.3b. Down 72% from 52-week high of $21.49 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $10.96 (implying +79% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -91.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 72% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -109% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OPRA and STUB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 34.8 points in favor of OPRA. The widest single difference is Growth, where OPRA leads by 35.1 points.
GrowthOPRA 95.4 · STUB 60.3OPRA +35.1
ValueOPRA 63.0 · STUB 29.1OPRA +33.9
QualityOPRA 68.9 · STUB 35.7OPRA +33.2
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is OPRA or STUB the better stock?
OPRA scores higher: OPRA 74.5, STUB 39.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do OPRA and STUB differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where OPRA leads by 35 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. OPRA leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are OPRA and STUB scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.