Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OPRA scored 74.5, PPLI scored 36.5 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PPLI's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but OPRA's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
OPRA
Opera Limited
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
74.5
$17.58 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
38.0
OPRA leads
PPLI
People Incorporated
Internet Content & Information · Quality-Growth
36.5
$40.89 · $3.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestPPLI7.6x
Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
Strongest balance sheetOPRA0.01
Highest qualityOPRA69 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueOPRA-30%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OPRA
stronger →← stronger
PPLI
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
47
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
63
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
OPRA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OPRA
PPLI
$112mC
FCF
$124mC
+27.9%A-
Rev
-8.4%D
0.01A
D/E
0.28A-
12.1xB+
P/E
7.6xA-
0.55A-
PEG
12.91D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OPRA
PPLI
30% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
114% above
~6%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~18%/yr
+11%
1-yr DCF upside
-48%
+43%
5-yr DCF upside
-53%
+108%
10-yr DCF upside
-60%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OPRA
Why this score
Cut its dividend
PPLI
Why this score
Buying back stock
The companies
OPRAOpera Limited
Internet Content & Information · $17.58 · beta 1.20
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $20.78. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Dividend payout 86% of earnings on a 4.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
PPLIPeople Incorporated
Internet Content & Information · $40.89 · beta 1.07
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $3.0b. 15% off the 52-week high of $48.32. Revenue -8% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $56.80 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Revenue contracting -8% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OPRA and PPLI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 38.0 points in favor of OPRA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthOPRA 95.4 · PPLI 13.8OPRA +81.6
QualityOPRA 68.9 · PPLI 46.8OPRA +22.1
ValueOPRA 63.0 · PPLI 75.5PPLI +12.5
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is OPRA or PPLI the better stock?
OPRA scores higher: OPRA 74.5, PPLI 36.5 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do OPRA and PPLI differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where OPRA leads by 82 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are OPRA and PPLI scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.