COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

GIL vs ONON

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GIL scored 64.1, ONON scored 74.9 — ONON leads.
Compare another set
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
Apparel Manufacturing · Quality-Growth
64.1
$56.17 · $10.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.8
ONON leads
ONON
On Holding AG
Footwear & Accessories · Quality-Growth
74.9
$30.02 · $10.0B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestONON20.3x
  • Fastest growthONON+30.0%
  • Strongest balance sheetONON0.29
  • Highest qualityONON71 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD64.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY53.5GROWTH73.1VALUE67.4
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD74.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY71.0GROWTH95.8VALUE72.2
GILONONQuality53.571.0Growth73.195.8Value67.472.2
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)1%40%15x49xGILONON

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFGIL$500mONON$396m
RevGIL+10.7%ONON+30.0%
D/EGIL1.48ONON0.29
P/EGIL43.5xONON20.3x
PEGGIL0.52ONON0.59
GIL
stronger →← stronger
ONON
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
73
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
67
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
ONON is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
GIL
ONON
$500mC
FCF
$396mC
+10.7%B
Rev
+30.0%A
1.48C+
D/E
0.29A-
43.5xD
P/E
20.3xB
0.52A-
PEG
0.59A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
GIL
ONON
10% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
112% above
~14%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~33%/yr
-25%
1-yr DCF upside
-61%
-9%
5-yr DCF upside
-53%
+20%
10-yr DCF upside
-39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
GIL
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Diluting shareholders
ONON
Why this score
  • Durable high returns
  • Diluting shareholders
  • Foreign reporter (CHF)
GILGildan Activewear Inc.
Apparel Manufacturing · $56.17 · beta 1.11
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $10.4b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $73.70 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.52 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $85.25 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 44x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
ONONOn Holding AG
Footwear & Accessories · $30.02 · beta 2.12
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $10.0b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $51.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +30% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.56 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.12 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where GIL and ONON diverge

On the headline score the gap is 10.8 points in favor of ONON. The widest single difference is Growth, where ONON leads by 22.7 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.