Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ONDS scored 50.1, UI scored 66.1 — UI leads.
Compare another set
ONDS
Ondas Inc.
Communication Equipment · Quality-Growth
50.1
$6.73 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.0
UI leads
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
Communication Equipment · Quality-Growth
66.1
$657.29 · $39.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Strongest balance sheetONDS0.03
Highest qualityUI89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ONDS
stronger →← stronger
UI
30
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
96
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
44
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
ONDS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ONDS
UI
-$172mF
FCF
$909mC+
—
Rev
+27.2%A-
0.03A-
D/E
0.06A-
22.5xD
P/S
—
—
PEG
1.10B+
—
P/E
41.5xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ONDS
UI
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
210% above
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~39%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-71%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-68%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-63%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ONDS
No notable signals flagged.
UI
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
The companies
ONDSOndas Inc.
Communication Equipment · $6.73 · beta 2.92
Why now
Communication Equipment · market cap $3.9b. Down 56% from 52-week high of $15.28 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.88 (implying +180% upside).
Moat
Net margin 96% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$172m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 56% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.92 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
UIUbiquiti Inc.
Communication Equipment · $657.29 · beta 1.31
Why now
Communication Equipment · market cap $39.8b. Down 40% from 52-week high of $1099.99 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory.
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 67% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 40% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 41x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. P/S 12.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ONDS and UI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.0 points in favor of UI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityONDS 29.7 · UI 89.3UI +59.6
GrowthONDS 96.0 · UI 80.9ONDS +15.1
ValueONDS 44.0 · UI 40.0ONDS +4.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is UI or ONDS the better stock?
UI scores higher: UI 66.1, ONDS 50.1 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do UI and ONDS differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where UI leads by 60 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are UI and ONDS scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.