Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OMC scored 41.1, STGW scored 40.8 — OMC leads.
Compare another set
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
Advertising Agencies · Quality-Growth
41.1
$76.48 · $21.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.3
OMC leads
STGW
Stagwell Inc.
Advertising Agencies · Quality-Growth
40.8
$8.65 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthOMC+10.1%
Strongest balance sheetOMC1.08
Highest qualitySTGW51 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueOMC-61%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OMC
stronger →← stronger
STGW
45
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
51
73
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
70
21
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
19
OMC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OMC
STGW
$2.4bB
FCF
$253mC
+10.1%B
Rev
+6.4%C+
1.08C+
D/E
2.41C
0.9xA-
P/S
—
15.97D
PEG
0.38A
—
P/E
173.0xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OMC
STGW
61% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
44% below
~-14%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
+134%
1-yr DCF upside
+57%
+154%
5-yr DCF upside
+79%
+187%
10-yr DCF upside
+114%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OMC
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Diluting shareholders
STGW
Why this score
Buying back stock
The companies
OMCOmnicom Group Inc.
Advertising Agencies · $76.48 · beta 0.70
Why now
Advertising Agencies · market cap $21.0b. 15% off the 52-week high of $89.57. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $102.00 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
Dividend payout 816% of earnings on a 4.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 1.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 6% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
STGWStagwell Inc.
Advertising Agencies · $8.65 · beta 1.30
Why now
Advertising Agencies · market cap $2.1b. 9% off the 52-week high of $9.55. PEG 0.38 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $10.71 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
D/E 2.41 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trailing P/E 173.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 0.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OMC and STGW diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityOMC 45.0 · STGW 50.5STGW +5.5
GrowthOMC 73.3 · STGW 70.3OMC +3.0
ValueOMC 21.1 · STGW 19.1level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is OMC or STGW the better stock?
OMC scores higher: OMC 41.1, STGW 40.8 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do OMC and STGW differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where STGW leads by 6 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are OMC and STGW scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.