COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
OLN vs SOLS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OLN scored 50.2, SOLS scored 55.2 — SOLS leads.
Compare another set
OLN
Olin Corp
50.2
$18.40 · $2.1B
Score gap
5.0
SOLS leads
SOLS
Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc.
55.2
$56.16 · $8.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthSOLS+9.2%
- Strongest balance sheetOLN1.54
- Highest qualitySOLS51 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueOLN-43%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OLN
stronger →← stronger
SOLS
37
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
51
35
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
97
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
66
SOLS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OLN
SOLS
$303mC
FCF
$195mC
+2.6%C
Rev
+9.2%B
1.54C
D/E
1.53D
0.3xA
P/S
—
—
PEG
0.64A-
—
P/E
42.5xC
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OLN
SOLS
43% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
133% above
~-11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~32%/yr
+78%
1-yr DCF upside
-64%
+77%
5-yr DCF upside
-57%
+76%
10-yr DCF upside
-45%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OLN
No notable signals flagged.
SOLS
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
OLNOlin Corp
Why now
Chemicals · market cap $2.1b. Down 40% from 52-week high of $30.46 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -2.9%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 40% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 126% of earnings on a 4.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
SOLSSolstice Advanced Materials, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $8.9b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $90.80 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $80.43 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 43x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OLN and SOLS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 5.0 points in favor of SOLS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueOLN 96.5 · SOLS 65.7OLN +30.8
- GrowthOLN 35.2 · SOLS 50.0SOLS +14.8
- QualityOLN 37.1 · SOLS 51.3SOLS +14.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.