COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
OLED vs VICR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. OLED scored 63.4, VICR scored 66.5 — VICR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. OLED's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but VICR's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
63.4
$85.75 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.1
VICR leads
VICR
Vicor Corporation
66.5
$193.56 · $8.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestOLED20.7x
- Fastest growthVICR+96.1%
- Strongest balance sheetVICR0.01
- Highest qualityOLED82 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
OLED
stronger →← stronger
VICR
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
41
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
76
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
47
OLED is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
OLED
VICR
$220mC
FCF
$87mC-
-8.3%D
Rev
+96.1%A
0.01A
D/E
0.01A
20.7xB+
P/E
62.0xC
1.00B+
PEG
1.03B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
OLED
VICR
40% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
659% above
~18%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
-37%
1-yr DCF upside
-90%
-29%
5-yr DCF upside
-87%
-15%
10-yr DCF upside
-81%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
OLED
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
VICR
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
OLEDUniversal Display Corporation
Why now
Electronic Components · market cap $3.9b. Down 44% from 52-week high of $153.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -8% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $115.37 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -8% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 44% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.56 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
VICRVicor Corporation
Why now
Electronic Components · market cap $8.9b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $382.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +96% — in hypergrowth territory. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $386.25 (implying +100% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trailing P/E 62.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.38 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where OLED and VICR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.1 points in favor of VICR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthOLED 41.0 · VICR 91.1VICR +50.1
- ValueOLED 76.2 · VICR 47.1OLED +29.1
- QualityOLED 81.7 · VICR 68.6OLED +13.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.